2016
DOI: 10.1177/0278364916632896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perching with a robotic insect using adaptive tracking control and iterative learning control

Abstract: Inspired by the aerial prowess of flying insects, we demonstrate that their robotic counterpart, an insect-scale flapping-wing robot, can mimic an aggressive maneuver seen in natural fliers— landing on a vertical wall. Such acrobatic movement differs from simple lateral maneuvers or hover, and therefore requires additional considerations in the control strategy. In this paper, we propose a single-loop adaptive tracking flight control suite designed with an emphasis on the ability to track dynamic trajectories,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, many demonstrations of pitch-up manoeuvres with physical prototypes, both with fixed wings and quadrotors, have relied on motion capture systems for absolute situational awareness. These systems have been used for experiments to empirically generate the required control for trajectory planning (figure 3a) [57,156] and can give continuous position feedback (figure 3c) [142,143,[157][158][159][160][161][162]. The few robots that have not required a motion capture system use sensors to detect a wall and initiate a pitch-up manoeuvre ( figure 3b,c) [18,51,52,163].…”
Section: Landing and Take-off In Aerial Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, many demonstrations of pitch-up manoeuvres with physical prototypes, both with fixed wings and quadrotors, have relied on motion capture systems for absolute situational awareness. These systems have been used for experiments to empirically generate the required control for trajectory planning (figure 3a) [57,156] and can give continuous position feedback (figure 3c) [142,143,[157][158][159][160][161][162]. The few robots that have not required a motion capture system use sensors to detect a wall and initiate a pitch-up manoeuvre ( figure 3b,c) [18,51,52,163].…”
Section: Landing and Take-off In Aerial Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on limited previous studies and experimental evidence, we proposed simple models to capture the effects of wind disturbances on the translational and rotational dynamics of the robot for control purposes. With a few simplifying assumptions, two disturbance rejection schemes compatible with the adaptive tracking flight controller previously developed in [17] were presented. The strategies were implemented and verified in a series of flight control experiments, including gusts with constant and time-varying wind speeds with air speed up to 80 cm s 21 (advance ratio J a ¼ 0.14).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we present two wind disturbance rejection schemes and demonstrate how they can be implemented on the existing adaptive tracking flight controller presented in [17]. The controller is comprised of two primary components: an attitude controller and an altitude controller, operating in parallel.…”
Section: Flight Control Strategies 31 Adaptive Tracking Flight Contmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the estimate of distance, aerial robots potentially benefit from the ability to deploy a landing gear at a suitable moment or to approach the surface at arbitrary speed [42,43]. That is, the landing task is no longer constrained to a constant rate of optic flow.…”
Section: Altitude Estimation During Landing Maneuversmentioning
confidence: 99%