2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10240-017-0093-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percolation of random nodal lines

Abstract: International audienceWe prove a Russo-Seymour-Welsch percolation theorem for nodal domains and nodal lines associated to a natural infinite dimensional space of real analytic functions on the real plane. More precisely, let $U$ be a smooth connected bounded open set in $\mathbb R^2$ and $\gamma, \gamma'$ two disjoint arcs of positive length in the boundary of $U$. We prove that there exists a positive constant $c$, such that for any positive scale $s$, with probability at least $c$ there exists a connected co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
174
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
174
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the events Cross (2R, R), the required statement is a direct consequence of Theorem 5.1. Standard gluing arguments (see [BG17,Section 4.2] for details) allow the conclusion to be extended to every quad.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the events Cross (2R, R), the required statement is a direct consequence of Theorem 5.1. Standard gluing arguments (see [BG17,Section 4.2] for details) allow the conclusion to be extended to every quad.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, one would first discretise the field by restricting it to a lattice (as in [BG17] for instance), and view crossings of quads as paths on this lattice. One might then hope to apply the non-product OSSS inequality directly to the (finite) family of Gaussian variables f (v) that determine each crossing event.…”
Section: Overview Of Our Methods and Outline Of The Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If D 0 had a.s. an unbounded connected component, then, by symmetry (since f is centered) this would also be the case for R 2 \ D 0 . But this would imply that N 0 has an unbounded connected component, thus contradicting Theorem 2.2 of [Ale96].-More recently, Beffara and Gayet [BG16] have proved a more quantitative version of Theorem 1.1 which holds for a large family of positively correlated stationary Gaussian fields such that κ(x) = O(|x| −α ) for some α sufficiently large. In [RV17], the authors of the present paper have revisited the results by [BG16] and weaken the assumptions on α.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sets have been studied through their connections to percolation theory (see [MS83a,MS83b,MS86], [Ale96], [BS07], [BG16], [BM18], [BMW17], [RV17]). In this theory, one wishes to determine whether of not there exist unbounded connected components of certain random sets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%