2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pjnns.2014.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of painful vertebral compression fractures: Effect on local kyphosis and one-year outcomes in pain and disability

Abstract: Rapid significant pain relief after kyphoplasty followed by long-term pain release and disability reduction obtained in all patients was most probably the result of vertebral augmentation. The correction of local kyphosis had no influence on the outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a US large claims database analysis showed that PKP was associated with a significant reduction in mortality compared to conservative treatment and PVP. PKP is now considered to be as minimally invasive and effective as conventional PVP for rapid pain relief in patients with painful OVCFs resistant to conservative treatment [11,13,14]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a US large claims database analysis showed that PKP was associated with a significant reduction in mortality compared to conservative treatment and PVP. PKP is now considered to be as minimally invasive and effective as conventional PVP for rapid pain relief in patients with painful OVCFs resistant to conservative treatment [11,13,14]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Intraoperative images showed that several pieces of leaked cement fragments had been removed (a) and bone cement was exposed after pulling the dural sac aside (b) dilation, cement leakage is still considered the most common complication of PKP [13]. At present, the incidence of bone cement leakage has varied between 5 and 87% in the literature [14,15]. The most probable reason for the significant difference in the rate of bone cement leakage is that many studies mainly rely on x-ray examination for the diagnosis of bone cement leakage, rather than CT scan, which may result in missed diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boger A. claimed that the injection of bone cement should be delayed as much as possible to prevent leakage and over ow [12] . The incidence rate of bone cement leakage has varied between 5 and 87% [13][14] , most of which was asymptomatic leakage and pulmonary cement embolism or spinal injury was rarely reported [15][16] . Yeom [17] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%