2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/8410203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Pregnancy: Modeling of the Fetal Absorbed Dose

Abstract: There is a gap in the literature regarding fetal radiation exposure from interventional cardiac procedures. With an increasingly large and complex cohort of pregnant cardiac patients, it is necessary to evaluate the safety of invasive cardiac procedures and interventions in this population. Here we present a case of a patient with multiple medical comorbidities and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) at 15 weeks’ gestation, managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We were able to mini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radial artery approach is preferred over femoral to minimize radiation risk and vascular damage near the fetus. 2,11 Femoral access was used in our patient because of the small diameter of her radial artery and potential need of mechanical circulatory support considering she had a left anterior descending artery STEMI in twin pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radial artery approach is preferred over femoral to minimize radiation risk and vascular damage near the fetus. 2,11 Femoral access was used in our patient because of the small diameter of her radial artery and potential need of mechanical circulatory support considering she had a left anterior descending artery STEMI in twin pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,73 Other techniques suggested to minimise radiation to the patient include using a lower frame rate (7.5 frames/s), using wedge filters, changing the projection frequently to distribute radiation and opening the iris on the television camera, which allows a lower increase in beam intensity. 74,75…”
Section: Methods To Minimise Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the recommended DAPT duration in DES shortens, however, BMS is likely to fall increasingly out of favor. This is especially true given that DES have been shown to be used safely in pregnancy [ 8 , 42 , 43 ]; the safety and success profile of DES in the non-pregnant patient is favorable when compared to BMS [ 8 , 43 ]. Newer generation DES are also approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for DAPT duration as short as 28 days [ 44 ], which may be advantageous given the potential limitations of DAPT use at the time of peri-delivery anesthesia.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%