2010
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous coronary intervention of moderate to severe calcified coronary lesions: Insights from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry

Abstract: Objectives-To evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) when compared with bare metal stents (BMS) in patients with moderate to severe calcified coronary lesions.Background-Calcified coronary lesions present unique technical challenges during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and it is not known if drug eluting stents (DES) are as safe and as effective in the presence of calcium, as randomized trials typically exclude this common patient subset.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
36
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…During the mean three years of follow-up, 0.8% of patients had acute myocardial infarction, 0.4% died, 5.5% had restenosis, and 3.2% had target lesion revascularization. These results coincide well with those from recent published studies (Bangalore et al, 2011;Benezet et al, 2011;Dardas et al, 2011). Based on our experience, complications and MACE rates could be reduced by: increasing burr size step by step, using a reasonable burr/artery ratio (0.5-0.7), maintaining systolic blood pressure at ≥100 mmHg during the procedure, allowing enough time for observing coronary flow between two rotations, applying routine post-dilatation with non-compliant balloons, and using IVUS guidance for high risk patient subsets such as those with left main disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…During the mean three years of follow-up, 0.8% of patients had acute myocardial infarction, 0.4% died, 5.5% had restenosis, and 3.2% had target lesion revascularization. These results coincide well with those from recent published studies (Bangalore et al, 2011;Benezet et al, 2011;Dardas et al, 2011). Based on our experience, complications and MACE rates could be reduced by: increasing burr size step by step, using a reasonable burr/artery ratio (0.5-0.7), maintaining systolic blood pressure at ≥100 mmHg during the procedure, allowing enough time for observing coronary flow between two rotations, applying routine post-dilatation with non-compliant balloons, and using IVUS guidance for high risk patient subsets such as those with left main disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, coronary obstruction induced by calcium debris is not a contraindication for PCI, despite the associated risk of certain complications [11,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10,12,32 Although routine use of rotational atherectomy did not improve outcomes after DES implantation, 5,6 such a device might technically be required in cases of tight and calcified lesions, to allow subsequent passage of balloons and stents. In most cases, the simple passage of a single burr is sufficient to smoothen the vessel lumen, or to disrupt the continuity of intravascular calcium rings, to enable subsequent balloon dilatation and stent implantation.…”
Section: Patient Selection For Coronary Orbital Atherectomy Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%