2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma: Potential Pitfalls and complications and how to avoid them

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports on minimally invasive treatments have focused on image-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. This technique is currently the treatment of choice for most osteoid osteomas because of high success rates, yet there are limitations, such as lack of direct visualization of the operative field, incorrect displacement of the radiofrequency electrode, and thermal injury [10][11][12] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports on minimally invasive treatments have focused on image-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. This technique is currently the treatment of choice for most osteoid osteomas because of high success rates, yet there are limitations, such as lack of direct visualization of the operative field, incorrect displacement of the radiofrequency electrode, and thermal injury [10][11][12] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a margin of safety is at least >1 cm from the lesion to the neurovascular bundle or skin surface 21 . The installation of 10% dextrose solution in the subcutaneous plane or the joint cavity may be beneficial 22 . Furthermore, MR‐guided focused ultrasound ablation therapy (MRgFUS) emerges as a new non‐invasive radiology revolution with little damage to the neurovascular bundle or articular cartilage 23–25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, relatively large lesions measuring >1 cm in size might have higher odds of recurrence 26,27 . The use of a multi‐pronged probe or multiple probe placements is recommended 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations