Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open fenestration discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective propensity score-matched study with more than 5 years of follow-up

Abstract

Objective We compared the long-term outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) with those of open fenestration discectomy (OFD) in treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods 281 patients were included from January 2013 to December 2018, of whom 228 underwent PELD and 53 underwent OFD. General information of patients was collected and imbalances in covariates between groups were corrected using propensity score matching (PSM). Then, the clinical function scores, imaging data, and complications were compared. Results Among participants, 102 patients were successfully matched and were followed for 62–128 months. Compared to the OFD group, the PELD group indicated greater improvements in visual analog scale score of low back pain (VAS-BP), Japanese orthopedic association (JOA), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) at 7 days postoperatively and the last follow-up ( P < 0.05). At 24 months postoperatively and the last follow-up, the disc height index (DHI), ratio of grays (RVG), and range of motion (ROM) were higher and the compass value was lower ( P < 0.05) in the PELD group compared to the OFD group, suggesting that the PELD procedure better maintained the mobility and stability of the responsible segment after surgery. The recurrence rates between the PELD (9.80%) and OFD (7.84%) groups did not reveal statistical differences ( P > 0.05). Conclusion PELD and OFD both provide acceptable clinical outcomes for LDH. However, PELD is superior to OFD in terms of relieving low back pain, delaying disc degeneration, and maintaining segmental stability.