2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/949785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous Extraction of Transvenous Permanent Pacemaker/Defibrillator Leads

Abstract: Background. Widespread use of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices has inevitably increased the need for lead revision/replacement. We report our experience in percutaneous extraction of transvenous permanent pacemaker/defibrillator leads. Methods. Thirty-six patients admitted to our centre from September 2005 through October 2012 for percutaneous lead extraction were included. Lead removal was attempted using Spectranetics traction-type system (Spectranetics Corp., Colorado, CO, USA) and VascoExtor c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with our study, Andrzej et al , [11], also found that the most common indication for TLE was an infection. Similarly, indications of extraction in Stylianos P et al , [12] study was an infection in 69.4% of the patients and led dysfunction in 30.6% of the patients. While in the EHRA survey 2012, the infection was the indication in 70% of the patients and non-infective indications in 30% of the patients [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In agreement with our study, Andrzej et al , [11], also found that the most common indication for TLE was an infection. Similarly, indications of extraction in Stylianos P et al , [12] study was an infection in 69.4% of the patients and led dysfunction in 30.6% of the patients. While in the EHRA survey 2012, the infection was the indication in 70% of the patients and non-infective indications in 30% of the patients [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In our study, older leads were associated with significantly prolonged procedure time compared to other leads (P-value < 0.001) and associated with a higher incidence of complications of TLE with a P-value 0.011 with no effect on patient outcome. However, Stylianos et al, a study [12], [15] noted that lead age per se did not hurt lead extraction success rate or occurrence of complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paraskevaidis et al [11] showed success rates above 90% using non-powered traction tools, with minimal complications. In a study that used laser-powered sheaths followed by mechanical tools, patients had complete extraction in more than 95% of the cases, with complications in less than 1% [12] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical sheaths are advanced over the lead and break fibrotic attachments between the lead and vein. 29 Beyond mechanical sheaths are laser sheaths. Laser sheaths use circumferential fiber-optic cables to transmit laser light and disrupt the fibrotic attachments.…”
Section: Lead Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%