1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80370-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous Native Renal Biopsy: Comparison of a 1.2-mm Spring-driven System With a Traditional 2-mm Hand-driven System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
39
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter should, in fact, be regarded as an epiphenomenon because of the high incidence (reported in up to 60%-90% of cases after examination prospectively with ultrasonography or computertomography). Of note, several authors found that a hematoma alone is not a reliable predictor of a serious adverse outcome (7,16,26,27). Perirenal hematomas should not be regarded as a clinical significant complication in the absence of significant bleeding or persisting pain necessitating delayed hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter should, in fact, be regarded as an epiphenomenon because of the high incidence (reported in up to 60%-90% of cases after examination prospectively with ultrasonography or computertomography). Of note, several authors found that a hematoma alone is not a reliable predictor of a serious adverse outcome (7,16,26,27). Perirenal hematomas should not be regarded as a clinical significant complication in the absence of significant bleeding or persisting pain necessitating delayed hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of glomeruli per biopsy was significantly less with the 18-gauge needle (9 glomeruli) compared to that obtained with the 14- or 16-gauge needles (12 glomeruli each, p < 0.001), and the adequacy rate was lower at 94.3%. A number of studies have shown that the diagnostic yield is greater with 14-gauge automated needles compared to 16- or 18-gauge needles, and the quality of the sample has been shown to be superior, with more ‘intact' glomeruli and less ‘crush or fragmentation' artifact [3,8,11,21,29,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. In the only prospective study assessing the differences between automated needle sizes, Nicholson et al [37] demonstrated that the use of a 14-gauge needle resulted not only in a significantly larger sample size (15 vs. 11 vs. 9 glomeruli, p < 0.05) but also greater diagnostic success (85 vs. 76 vs. 53%, p < 0.05) compared to the use of 16- or 18-gauge needles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that have addressed this issue in native kidney biopsies have been flawed as they compared complications in patients who were biopsied with smaller gauge automated needles to those of patients who were biopsied with larger gauge manual needles; thus, their results may reflect the impact of biopsy technique rather than needle size (12)(13)(14). To date, the only prospective study to evaluate the impact of needle size using automated biopsy needles has been conducted in renal allograft biopsies; no significant difference in complication rate was found, but the sample was significantly greater with the 14-gauge needle biopsies (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%