Percutaneous or Open Release is the Most Effective Surgical Technique in Diabetic Recurrent Trigger Finger in Short and Long Term Outcomes? A Clinical Review

Kastanis, Grigorios; Pantouvaki, A; Spyrantis, M; Christoforidis, Christos; Velivasakis, G

doi:10.31080/asor.2020.03.0176

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Third, this was not a long-term follow-up study. However, it was revealed that there were no statistical differences in clinical outcomes, including VAS and Quick DASH, at 6 months and 12 months after percutaneous or open release for trigger finger [32]. Additionally, several other studies on treatments for trigger finger also set the follow-up period to under 6 months, similarly to this study [14,[33][34][35].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 51%

The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation after Open Surgical Release for Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Saito,

Nakamichi,

Nakahara

et al. 2023

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: It is not clear whether rehabilitation after surgery for trigger finger is effective. The aim of this study was to reveal its effectiveness for trigger finger. Methods: This study was a randomized, controlled trial that included patients who underwent operations for trigger fingers. The patients in the rehabilitation group had postoperative occupational therapy (OT) for 3 months, while the patients in the control group were not referred for rehabilitation but received advice for a range of motion exercises. We evaluated the severity of trigger finger, Disability of Arm-Shoulder-Hand (DASH) score, pain-visual analogue scale (VAS), grip strength, whether they gained a full range of motion (ROM), and complications before and after surgery. Results: Finally, 29 and 28 patients were included in the control and rehabilitation groups, respectively. At final follow-up, the DASH score, grip strength, and ROM were significantly improved in the rehabilitation group compared to that preoperatively. At final follow-up, pain was significantly improved in both groups from that preoperatively. There were no significant differences in the results, including the DASH score, grip strength, ROM and pain-VAS between the control and rehabilitation groups at the final follow-up. Subgroup analysis showed that there is a significant difference in the DASH score of patients doing housework or light work and those with a duration of symptoms >12 months between the control and rehabilitation groups at the final follow-up.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 51%

The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation after Open Surgical Release for Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Saito,

Nakamichi,

Nakahara

et al. 2023

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation After Open Surgical Release for Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Saito,

Nakamichi,

Nakahara

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: It is not clear whether rehabilitation after surgery for trigger finger is effective. The aim of this study was to reveal the effectiveness for trigger finger. Methods: This study was a randomized, controlled trial that included patients who underwent operations for trigger fingers. The patients in the rehabilitation group had postoperative occupational therapy (OT) for 3 months, while the patients in the control group were not referred for rehabilitation but received advice for a range of motion exercise. We evaluated the severity of trigger finger, Disability of Arm-Shoulder-Hand (DASH) score, pain-visual analogue scale (VAS), grip strength, whether they gained a full range of motion (ROM), and complications before and after surgery. Results: Finally, 29 and 28 patients were included in the control and rehabilitation groups, respectively. DASH score, grip strength, and ROM were significantly improved in the rehabilitation group from that preoperatively at final follow-up. Pain was significantly improved in both groups from that preoperatively at final follow-up. Subgroup analysis showed that there is a significant difference in the DASH score of patients doing housework or light work and those with a duration of symptoms &gt; 12 months between the control and rehabilitation groups at the final follow-up.

show abstract

Percutaneous or Open Release is the Most Effective Surgical Technique in Diabetic Recurrent Trigger Finger in Short and Long Term Outcomes? A Clinical Review

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation after Open Surgical Release for Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation after Open Surgical Release for Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation After Open Surgical Release for Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About