2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous Paravalvular Leak Closure Early Post-MV Replacement With Retrieval of Embolized Muscular VSD Device

Abstract: This report describes a case of paravalvular leak (PVL) closure 20 days after surgery that was complicated by an embolized 10-mm device in a patient who underwent redo PVL closure after 6 months. Waiting for 3 months postoperatively to close a PVL is recommended. If earlier leak closure is mandatory, accepting a suboptimal result with a moderate residual leak is advised. ( Level of Difficulty: Intermediate. )

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Percutaneous valve closure is less invasive, permits multiple attempts, and is an option in patients who are at high risk for open heart surgery [8,9]. Another similar case report, by Abueletta et al, advocates that percutaneous PVL closure with VSD can be done at least 3 months after the prior surgery [10]. However, we believe it is best not to wait that long after surgery, and suggest prompt intervention because of worse clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Percutaneous valve closure is less invasive, permits multiple attempts, and is an option in patients who are at high risk for open heart surgery [8,9]. Another similar case report, by Abueletta et al, advocates that percutaneous PVL closure with VSD can be done at least 3 months after the prior surgery [10]. However, we believe it is best not to wait that long after surgery, and suggest prompt intervention because of worse clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Risk factors for embolization of paravalvular leak devices include very large regurgitant orifices, more than one interlocking device and inadequate annular fibrosis in an acute postoperative setting. 1) 2) On a follow-up of 6 years, he was asymptomatic with normal prosthesis function and permanent atrial fibrillation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%