2008
DOI: 10.1002/lt.21507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous transhepatic treatment of hepaticojejunal anastomotic biliary strictures after living donor liver transplantation

Abstract: Endoscopic treatment has largely replaced surgery as the initial treatment for biliary strictures following living donor liver transplantation; however, this treatment is nearly impossible in patients who have previously undergone hepaticojejunostomy (HJ). We therefore retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic treatment in patients who developed HJ strictures following living donor liver transplantation. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and subsequent balloon dilation of bil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[5][6][7] In cases of hepaticojejunostomy (HJ), a gastric access loop can be constructed at the time of surgery in the event that future access would be required. 8 In cases of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), endoscopic or laparoscopic gastrostomy placement with subsequent stoma dilation for transgastric ERCP 9 or laparoscopic transgastric ERCP is also possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] In cases of hepaticojejunostomy (HJ), a gastric access loop can be constructed at the time of surgery in the event that future access would be required. 8 In cases of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), endoscopic or laparoscopic gastrostomy placement with subsequent stoma dilation for transgastric ERCP 9 or laparoscopic transgastric ERCP is also possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,8,[13][14][15][16] In comparison, the treatment duration in our study was shorter than that for endoscopic plastic stent placement (269-500 days) or for percutaneous transhepatic management (11.2 6 7.4 months). 4,8,13 Therefore, we assume that covered retrievable stents have several advantages. First, the duration of treatment can be reduced because of the larger diameter of the fully covered retrievable stents (8-10 mm) compared to that of plastic stents (5-12 Fr) or indwelling drainage catheters .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…8 Following PTBD, the size of the original drainage catheter in each patient was gradually increased at 4 to 6 week intervals until a 14-French (14-Fr) catheter was finally placed. After maintaining the 14-Fr internal drainage catheter for at least 12 weeks, the catheter was then repositioned above the stricture, and the hub was clamped for at least 4 weeks while the presence of possible elastic recoil at the site of the treated strictures was assessed.…”
Section: Drainage Catheter Interposition (Group 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such cases, percutaneous treatment with balloon dilation with or without long-term biliary drainage and bare or covered stent placement, have been suggested as possible alternatives [2, 48]. …”
Section: Etiologymentioning
confidence: 99%