2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5442-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous versus surgical femoro-femoral veno-arterial ECMO: a propensity score matched study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
3
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
84
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Haemolysis and increased load of filtered pigment (e.g. myoglobin, CK) may result from muscle damage due to local ischaemia during ECMO [31,110]. Also, raised levels of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haemolysis and increased load of filtered pigment (e.g. myoglobin, CK) may result from muscle damage due to local ischaemia during ECMO [31,110]. Also, raised levels of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is weak evidence suggesting an increased risk of infection with central cannulation and a decreased risk with single-site, dual-lumen cannulae [7,38]. In a recent single-center propensity score-matched analysis of 814 patients undergoing venoarterial ECLS, cannula site infections were significantly more common with a surgical approach than a percutaneous approach (27.8% vs 16.5%, p < 0.001) [40]. Historical data suggest an increased incidence of bloodstream infections in ECLS patients compared with non-ECLS critically ill patients [41], although this has not been corroborated in the era of modern ECLS technology and practices.…”
Section: Risk Factors For the Development Of Infections During Eclsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) 22.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) with a R software -plug-ins (R-2.15.3, https://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/ old/) [20,21]. Statistical tests were considered significant at P < 0.05 (two-sided).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%