2017
DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcx003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfect Bedfellows: Why Early Intervention Can Play a Critical Role in Protecting Children—A Response to Featherstone et al. (2014) ‘A Marriage Made in Hell: Child Protection Meets Early Intervention’

Abstract: The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Perfect bedfellows: why early intervention can play a critical role in protecting children -a response to Featherstone et al. (2014) 'A marriage made in hell: child protection meets early intervention'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows referral to intervention programs to prepare the parents for the postpartum phase, to protect them from negative outcomes and to promote their resilience. Promisingly, supportive and preventive intervention concepts have been established [see ( 20 , 55 58 )]. First efforts were made to train and qualify health and social professionals to recognize at-risk families and provide early practical assistance for them [e.g., ( 56 )].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows referral to intervention programs to prepare the parents for the postpartum phase, to protect them from negative outcomes and to promote their resilience. Promisingly, supportive and preventive intervention concepts have been established [see ( 20 , 55 58 )]. First efforts were made to train and qualify health and social professionals to recognize at-risk families and provide early practical assistance for them [e.g., ( 56 )].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been argued that child and family social work in England operates as a ‘hybrid’ system, combining family support services and child protection, and as such, is placed somewhere between the child protection focus of the US, and the family support service orientation of the Nordic countries, such as Norway and Finland (Gilbert et al., 2011). The balance between family services and child protection in England and Wales is variable and highly contested (see Axford and Berry, 2018; Featherstone et al., 2014). Social workers have become the target of ‘blame, hostility and anger’ (Ruch et al., 2014: 318) following high-profile child death enquiries.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different types of debate, of course, and all have their place: those that are essentially technical, focused on method and the interpretation of results (such as the one in this edition, or the one between Dennis Gorman on the one hand, and Gilbert Botvin, Kenneth Griffin, David Hawkins and Rico Catalano on the other, about trials of substance abuse prevention programmes: Gorman, 2005a, b; Botvin and Griffin, 2005; Hawkins and Catalano, 2005); those that are more philosophical, concerned with epistemological and ontological approaches (notably the spat between Stephen Webb and Brian Sheldon on evidence-based practice in social work: Webb, 2001; Sheldon, 2001); and those that are fundamentally about ideology (evident, in part, in recent critiques of early intervention as a neoliberal enterprise, including the exchange between Brid Featherstone and colleagues and Vashti Berry and yours truly: Featherstone et al , 2014; Axford and Berry, 2017).…”
Section: In Praise Of Academic Dust-upsmentioning
confidence: 99%