2018
DOI: 10.17645/si.v6i3.1451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfect for the Job? Overqualification of Immigrants and their Descendants in the Norwegian Labor Market

Abstract: Compared to the majority population, studies have shown that non-western immigrants are more likely to work in jobs for which they are overqualified. These findings are based on coarse measures of jobs, and an important question is how sensitive these findings are to the definition of jobs. By using detailed information from Norwegian register data 2014, we provide a methodological innovation in comparing individuals working in the same occupation, industry, sector, firm, and municipality. In this way, we meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Larsen, Rogne and Birkelund show that counter to their initial hypotheses, relative differences in overqualification do not seem to differ substantially by gender, nor by sector refuting the idea that the public sector plays a sheltering role (Larsen, Rogne, & Birkelund, 2018). They find that, while the prevalence of overqualification is generally higher for immigrants than for their descendants and majority members, these differences seem to diminish by time since immigration.…”
Section: The Country Studies: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Larsen, Rogne and Birkelund show that counter to their initial hypotheses, relative differences in overqualification do not seem to differ substantially by gender, nor by sector refuting the idea that the public sector plays a sheltering role (Larsen, Rogne, & Birkelund, 2018). They find that, while the prevalence of overqualification is generally higher for immigrants than for their descendants and majority members, these differences seem to diminish by time since immigration.…”
Section: The Country Studies: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We aimed to add to the body of research by examining constructions of individual employability and labour market induction, and the role of intersecting social categorizations in these constructions. From previous research we know that the identification of employees' transferable competencies is difficult for organizations in general (Bernhard-Oettel and Näswall 2015), and the reformulation of personal assets and revaluation of previous education and work experience between contexts is problematic (e.g., Eggenhofer-Rehart et al 2018;Larsen et al 2018;Mancinelli et al 2010;van Riemsdijk et al 2016). The importance of an intersectional perspective in interpreting these processes is corroborated by research exploring employability and perceived difficulties associated with gender, actual or assumed family responsibilities, age, class, and ethnicity for individuals in or at the margins of the labour market (e.g., Allen et al 2013;Kelan 2014;Reid and LeDrew 2013).…”
Section: Discussion: Towards Employability? the Neoliberal Subject Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recognize that our exploration is focused on a Western context that may differ from the migrants' predominantly non-Western contexts of origin. This entails a reformulation of employment opportunities and revaluation of previous education and/or work experience, usually to the disadvantage of the individual migrant (e.g., Eggenhofer-Rehart et al 2018;Larsen et al 2018;Mancinelli et al 2010;van Riemsdijk et al 2016). In the present study, we combine intersectional and discourse analytical approaches with the understanding that individual employability is subjectively constructed in order to explore labour market induction, employability constructions and categorizations in the discourse used by government agencies directly involved in the labour market integration of newly arrived migrants.…”
Section: Aims and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations