Perfectionist decision-making style and ethical investment willingness

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the ethical investment willingness decision-making process to understand how investors evaluate corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected through a survey of 298 individual investors and analyzed using structural equation modeling. Findings Results reveal that perfectionist decision-making style is positively related to perceived moral intensity, substitutability of financial returns, and ethical investment willingness. In addition, perceived moral intensity and substitutability of financial returns are positively related to ethical investment willingness. Finally, perceived moral intensity is positively related to substitutability of financial returns, and a two-factor causal mediation model is supported. Research limitations/implications The limitation of this study was that the pre-tests and sampling methods required all participants to have investing experience; however, procurement of trading information for each investor was impossible; thus, actual investment behaviors were undetermined. This study shed light on the mediating roles of perceived moral intensity and the substitutability of financial returns. Future studies can further investigate the factors influencing perceived moral intensity and the substitutability of financial returns. Practical implications Future ethical investment education can focus on cultivate the ability to distinguish ethical investments and change ethical investment willingness into actual investment behavior. Originality/value Understanding the relationship between these variables can help understand why ethical investment willingness varies among investors and how the traditional financial theory investment decision model should be revised as, internationally, more people have begun to observe CSR and sustainable development.

The Impact of Firm’s Unethical Behavior in Investment Decisions Among Young Investors in China

“…Based on H1, this study explored the impact of the firm development stage with unethical behavior on investors' decisions. In line with previous findings, 1,2 results in current study showed that investors were significantly less willing to invest firms with unethical behavior, although both startups and mature firms exhibited good development and investment potential in the experimental scenario. More importantly, investors exhibited a greater decrease in willingness to invest in mature firms than startups, implying that investors might be more tolerant of unethical startup behavior, supporting H2.…”

Investor personality and investment performance: from the perspective of psychological traits

“…IP of an individual investor. Personality traits cannot be changed and are relatively stable (Xu et al , 2017; Lin et al , 2018); however, OC (financial) and risk tolerance (financial) are some of the investment biases that are often genetically correlated with knowledge and external “nature” (Black et al , 2017; Xu et al , 2017) such as socio-economic status or education. Investors with higher financial OC often tend to overinvest, and they often result in excessive investment, which may result in personal losses even in the presence of clear feedback and advice (Cheng, 2007; Larkin and Leider, 2012).…”

Effects of member similarity on group norm conformity, group identity and social participation in the context of social networking sites

“…The incremental fit measures were the comparative fit index (CFI), normed fit index (NFI) and nonnormed fit index (NNFI; Ejarque and Campos, 2020). In this study, the CFI, NFI and NNFI were all greater than the acceptable standard of 0.9 (Lin et al, 2018b). Finally, the parsimonious fit measures were the parsimonious NFI (PNFI) and parsimonious GFI (PGFI; Chen, 2017).…”