2020
DOI: 10.33155/j.ramd.2020.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfil dermatoglífico y potencialidades físicas de niñas de gimnasia artística de competencia: Comparación con no gimnastas

Abstract: Objetivo: Identificar las potencialidades físicas, a través de perfiles dermatoglíficos, de niñas gimnastas de competencia comparadas con niñas no gimnastas. Método: Se midieron niñas no gimnastas (n=50) y niñas gimnastas (n=50) participantes en el Campeonato Regional de bases 2018, Zona 1 Norte de México, de los estados de Sonora, Sinaloa, Baja California, Baja California Sur y Chihuahua. Lo anterior a través del método dermatoglífico informatizado, sobre la base del protocolo propuesto por Cummins y Mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corroborating these findings, which expresses the theory of sports dermatoglyphics on dermatoglyphs as biological indicators of sports performance, so they can be used in the detection, selection and development of sports talent; as well as to support training planning in elite athletes (Zulaev & Abulkhanova, 2007;Del Vecchio & Gonçalves, 2011;Abramova et al, 2013;Nodari-Júnior et al, 2016;Nodari-Júnior, 2022;Gastélum-Cuadras et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Corroborating these findings, which expresses the theory of sports dermatoglyphics on dermatoglyphs as biological indicators of sports performance, so they can be used in the detection, selection and development of sports talent; as well as to support training planning in elite athletes (Zulaev & Abulkhanova, 2007;Del Vecchio & Gonçalves, 2011;Abramova et al, 2013;Nodari-Júnior et al, 2016;Nodari-Júnior, 2022;Gastélum-Cuadras et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%