2010
DOI: 10.2131/jts.35.835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) but not perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) showed DNA damage in comet assay on Paramecium caudatum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The different toxic effects of PFOA towards human and animals have been explored, such as reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, carcinogenicity, and immunotoxicity in experimental animals (Lau et al 2007;Olsen et al 2009). Additionally, according to previous studies, PFOA could inhibit the growth and development of macrophytes (Hanson et al 2005) and affect the survival of several invertebrates (Hazelton et al 2012;Kawamoto et al 2010). However, these toxicity studies of PFOA mainly focused on animals and plants, while the information on microorganisms is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The different toxic effects of PFOA towards human and animals have been explored, such as reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, carcinogenicity, and immunotoxicity in experimental animals (Lau et al 2007;Olsen et al 2009). Additionally, according to previous studies, PFOA could inhibit the growth and development of macrophytes (Hanson et al 2005) and affect the survival of several invertebrates (Hazelton et al 2012;Kawamoto et al 2010). However, these toxicity studies of PFOA mainly focused on animals and plants, while the information on microorganisms is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A typical TP53 response involves differential p21/WAF1 expression, which was not observed, and is induced by DNA damage. Perfluorooctane sulfonate does not appear to be genotoxic [50][51][52], although Liu et al [34] did report DNA damage at high PFOS exposures but concluded that it was likely apoptosis related. Recent evidence has shown that lipid peroxidation products can activate TP53 [53], which may explain results from the present study.…”
Section: Interaction Network and Potential Regulatory Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not as well-studied as the P. aurelia complex of species, P. caudatum also has a long history of research (Calkins 1902;Sonneborn 1933). Recent studies on P. caudatum involve investigations into quorum sensing (Fellous et al 2012), thermal adaptation (Krenek et al 2012), learning (Armus et al 2006), endosymbiosis and parasite-mediated selection (Duncan et al 2010(Duncan et al , 2011, and ecotoxicology (Rao et al 2007;Kawamoto et al 2010;Hailong et al 2011). P. caudatum cells are larger than those of the aurelia complex and have a single, larger micronucleus, whereas aurelia species have two smaller micronuclei (Fokin 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%