“…22,26,27,29,38 In the late 1980s, Proplast/Teflon® TMJ IP were found to brake or be rejected in many patients, because of the high biomechanical forces placed on them. 20,21,25,33,36,[39][40][41][42] The breakdown lead to production of fragmented particles which resulted in an immune foreign body response 21,25,39-42 , causing problems ranging from severe cutaneous inflammatory reaction in the pre-auricular and cheek areas 43 ; to severe degenerative joint disease with resorption and erosion of the TMJ bony structures, perforation into the middle cranial fossa 44,45,46 , chronic pain, increased joint noises, TMJ hypomobility, and malocclusion. The result was a dramatic clinical spectrum of failures for these implants.…”