2003
DOI: 10.1783/147118903101197557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perforation with the GyneFix<SUP>®</SUP> intrauterine implant: is there a common factor?

Abstract: This report describes an asymptomatic perforation with the GyneFix ® intrauterine contraceptive implant. A review of all other reports of this complication has been performed. Analysis of these reports suggests prolonged amenorrhoea secondary to continuous progestogen use as a possible common predisposing factor. Case studyA 22-year-old nulliparous woman underwent fitting of a GyneFix ® intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) at a family planning clinic. She had previously been using DepoProvera ® continuously… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their publication devoted explicitly to perforations with GyneFix, the authors not only discussed six cases of perforation but drew attention also to adhesions as one of the most common adverse events of copper-containing intrauterine devices. "Copper IUDs such as the GyneFix are thought to predispose the patient to adhesions once inside the peritoneal cavity [14]." As can be seen from the analysis of the information leaflet provided by the manufacturer of GyneFix, there is sufficient reason for the consumer to question the safety of the product and to turn to alternatives.…”
Section: An Implant In Disguise Of An Insertmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their publication devoted explicitly to perforations with GyneFix, the authors not only discussed six cases of perforation but drew attention also to adhesions as one of the most common adverse events of copper-containing intrauterine devices. "Copper IUDs such as the GyneFix are thought to predispose the patient to adhesions once inside the peritoneal cavity [14]." As can be seen from the analysis of the information leaflet provided by the manufacturer of GyneFix, there is sufficient reason for the consumer to question the safety of the product and to turn to alternatives.…”
Section: An Implant In Disguise Of An Insertmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 However, numerous case reports of perforations with this device are published. [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62]…”
Section: Coppermentioning
confidence: 99%