2019
DOI: 10.1109/jsyst.2019.2897824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of AF Relaying With Selection Combining in Nakagami-$m$ Fading

Abstract: This paper investigates performance analysis of a selection combining scheme, which utilizes a variable gain amplify and forward (AF) relay over a Nakagami-m fading channel. A selection combiner at a destination node chooses the better link between a relay channel and a direct channel. We derived exact closed-form expressions for moments of signal to noise ratio (SNR), ergodic capacity and average symbol error probability (SEP). Simulation examples confirm that our exact formulas offer a more accurate analysis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the destination uses the SC technique, the SNR obtained at the output of the combiner can be formulated similarly to Equation ( 3 ) of [ 58 ] as where b denotes index of the receive antenna at D used to decode , .…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the destination uses the SC technique, the SNR obtained at the output of the combiner can be formulated similarly to Equation ( 3 ) of [ 58 ] as where b denotes index of the receive antenna at D used to decode , .…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For selection combining approach, only the best relayed signal possessing the highest signal magnitude among the relayed signals is chosen. Then, the receiver at the destination will consider the signal from the source as well as the one from the best relayed signal and select the one with a larger SNR for decoding purpose [29]. The block diagram of the Double Differential Amplify Forward (DDAF) network employing SC scheme at the destination is portrayed in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%