2002
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2002.998686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of an improved 3-D PET Monte Carlo simulation and scatter correction

Abstract: We are developing an accelerated Monte Carlo simulation of positron emission tomography (PET) that can be used for scatter correction of three-dimensional (3-D) PET data. Our Monte Carlo technique accurately accounts for single, multiple, and dual Compton scatter events, attenuation through the patient bed, and activity from outside the field of view. We have incorporated innovative sampling techniques that are compatible with our simulation approach, increasing computational efficiency by a factor of seven wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because photons can undergo multiple scatters prior to detection, scatter is most accurately estimated using Monte Carlo photon-tracking simulations (62). However, these simulations are still computationally intractable (63). The distribution of scattered photons can be estimated much more quickly by using single-scatter approximation (SSA), which can be analytically calculated using the Klein–Nishina equation, as first proposed by Barney et al (64).…”
Section: New Algorithms For Image Reconstruction and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because photons can undergo multiple scatters prior to detection, scatter is most accurately estimated using Monte Carlo photon-tracking simulations (62). However, these simulations are still computationally intractable (63). The distribution of scattered photons can be estimated much more quickly by using single-scatter approximation (SSA), which can be analytically calculated using the Klein–Nishina equation, as first proposed by Barney et al (64).…”
Section: New Algorithms For Image Reconstruction and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[135][136][137][138] Although computationally intensive, more refined algorithms that use a patient-specific attenuation map, an estimate of the emission image and Monte Carlo-based radiation transport calculations to estimate the magnitude and spatial distribution of Compton scattered events that would be detected were also considered. [139][140][141] The major difficulty facing MRI-guided attenuation correction lies in the fact that the MR signal or tissue intensity level is not directly related to electron density, which renders conversion of MR images to attenuation maps less obvious compared to CT. The basic problem of attenuation map determination from MRI is to locate and map the major attenuating structures in the body.…”
Section: Iva Mri-guided Attenuation Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, one may have some statistical models Interestingly, system modeling plays a very important role in ET for optimizing detector design, configuration and materials (see Levin & Zaidi (2007) and Stickel & Cherry (2005)) 2 and for assesing acquisition and processing protocols, for example to study differences in image quality when using radionuclides with various positron ranges (Bai et al (2005)) or properties that are not possible to measure directly like the behavior of scattered photons (Dewaraja et al (2000)). Likewise, it is also a valuable tool in the design and assessment of correction and reconstruction methods (Zaidi & Koral (2004), Holdsworth et al (2002)) and in the study of an imaging system response (Alessio et al (2006)). System modeling, may also be used in the generation of the system matrix either by means of analytical calculations (see previous section) or by Monte Carlo computations (Rafecas, Mosler, Dietz, Pogl, Stamatakis, McElroy & Ziegler (2004), Alessio et al (2006), Vandenberghe et al (2006), Rahmim et al (2008)).…”
Section: System Modeling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%