ICM 2011 Proceeding 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icm.2011.6177404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of constraint solvers for coverage directed test generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prove the correct behaviour of the system according to its specification, testing the system on a wide set of input values is needed. We plan to adjust the generation of input test vectors to functional verification purposes and as an advantageous method seems to be an approach called Coverage Directed Test Generation (CDTG) [22] [23]. This method generates test vectors according to the defined design conditions and limitations which are called constraints.…”
Section: Test Vector Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove the correct behaviour of the system according to its specification, testing the system on a wide set of input values is needed. We plan to adjust the generation of input test vectors to functional verification purposes and as an advantageous method seems to be an approach called Coverage Directed Test Generation (CDTG) [22] [23]. This method generates test vectors according to the defined design conditions and limitations which are called constraints.…”
Section: Test Vector Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable automatic test generation and control, we need to be able to define scenarios by using parameters. As all parameters are not independent of one another, they should be able to constrain each other to limit the input space to legal scenarios, which can be done automatically through the use of a constraint solver (George & Mohamed, 2011). Hence, details used to describe roads are parameterized, allowing us to both randomly and deterministically generate roads and street networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We demonstrate one working example of such an 24 EM system that was evaluated using our platform: the mechanical robot and its electronic controller 25 in an FPGA. Different building blocks of the electronic robot controller allow us to model different effects 26 of faults on the whole mission of the robot (searching a path in a maze).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…346 The first method [25] (see Fig. 8) uses a random stimuli gener-347 ator, which generates a set of stimuli without any control.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%