Performance analysis of different series compensation schemes of
            <scp>SMIB</scp>
            power system incorporating
            <scp>PV</scp>
            generator

Qudah, Manar; Elhaija, Wejdan Abu; Widyan, Mohammad S.

doi:10.1002/2050-7038.12699

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[%] , 100 max    av V V PVUR (10) where: Vav is the average value of the phase voltage, and ΔVmax represents the maximum voltage deviation from the average value of the phase voltage.…”

Section: Case Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Coordinated Control of Single-Phase End-Users for Phase Load Balancing in Active Electric Distribution Networks

Grigoraș¹,

Noroc²,

Chelaru³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the paper, a coordinated control methodology of single-phase (1-P) end-users switching oper-ations on the phases of an active electric distribution network (AEDN) has been proposed to ob-tain a minimum unbalance degree at the coupling common point (CCP) level with the main dis-tribution system. The phase load balancing (PLB) process considers the smart devices that switch from one phase to another phase the 1-P end-users (consumers and prosumers) to compensate for the phase load unbalance. The proposed methodology has been tested successfully in an AEDN belonging to a Romanian Distribution Network Operator (DNO) containing 114 end-users (104 consumers/10 prosumers) integrated into the Smart Metering System (SMS). The op-timal solution leads to a value of the objective function by 1.00004, represented by the unbalance factor, very close to the ideal target, 1.00. A comparative analysis was conducted considering other possible PLB cases (the consumer-level PLB and prosumer-level PLB), obtaining similar values of the UF (1.027 vs. 1.028), slightly higher than in the hybrid-level PLB. Also, the signifi-cant technical benefits were quantified through an energy-saving of 58.73% and decreasing the phase voltage unbalance rate by 91 % compared to the initial case (without PLB). These results emphasized the positive impact of the proposed coordinated control methodology on the PLB process and evidenced its effectiveness and applicability in the AEDNs.

show abstract

Section: Case Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Coordinated Control of Single-Phase End-Users for Phase Load Balancing in Active Electric Distribution Networks

Grigoraș¹,

Noroc²,

Chelaru³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…24 The SMIB system incorporated by series compensating device with PV generator is presented in order to improve the power transfer capability. 25 A GA-based solution is proposed for designing of SSSC controller with the goal of enhancing the system's transient stability. 26 The power system oscillation is damped by bacterial foraging optimization algorithm (BFOA), which is compared with PI and GA tuned PI controller.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A modified sine cosine algorithm with ensemble search agent updating schemes for small signal stability analysis

Kar

Kumar

Singh

et al. 2021

Int Trans Electr Energ Syst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, a modified sine cosine algorithm (MSCA) is proposed and is applied to design the power system stabilizer (PSS) and lead lag compensatorbased static synchronous series compensator (SSSC) controller to enhance the power system stability. Two test systems: single machine infinite bus (SMIB) and multi-machine power system (MMPS) working under various loading conditions are taken as case studies. The objective of the work is to enhance the stability of the system by minimizing the rotor speed deviation of the generator. For this, the optimal controller parameters of PSS and SSSC are deter-

show abstract

“…To attenuate these effects and to optimally operate the AEDNs, the DNOs apply measures that involve load compensation, network reconfiguration, and phase swapping of the 1-P end-users. The first two measures have excellent results in the MV networks [9][10][11][12]. A mathematical model based on the phase and sequence components of the current in the phase load balancing (PLB), used to improve the power factor and eliminate the neutral current, has been proposed in [9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A mathematical model based on the phase and sequence components of the current in the phase load balancing (PLB), used to improve the power factor and eliminate the neutral current, has been proposed in [9]. In [10], Qudah et al studied and compared the performance of a power system equipped with a PV generator having the FACTS devices integrated. Gebru et al, in [11], performed a restructuration of a network and an integration of the switched capacitor bank based on the optimal allocation and size switchable capacitor banks and selection of the optimal structure of the network.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coordinated Control of Single-Phase End-Users for Phase Load Balancing in Active Electric Distribution Networks

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the paper, a coordinated control methodology of single-phase (1-P) end-users switching operations on the phases of an active electric distribution network (AEDN) has been proposed to obtain a minimum unbalance degree at the coupling common point (CCP) level with the main distribution system. The phase load balancing (PLB) process considers the smart devices that switch the 1-P end-users (consumers and prosumers) from one phase to another to compensate for the phase load unbalance. The proposed methodology has been tested successfully in an AEDN belonging to a Romanian Distribution Network Operator (DNO) containing 114 end-users (104 consumers/10 prosumers) integrated into the Smart Metering System (SMS). The optimal solution leads to a value of the objective function by 1.00, represented by the unbalance factor (UF), which could be identified with the ideal target. A comparative analysis was conducted considering other possible PLB cases (the consumer-level PLB and prosumer-level PLB), obtaining similar values of the UF (1.027 vs. 1.028), slightly higher than in the hybrid-level PLB. Additionally, the significant technical benefits were quantified through an energy-saving of 58.73% and decreasing the phase voltage unbalance rate by 91% compared to the initial case (without PLB). These results emphasized the positive impact of the proposed coordinated control methodology on the PLB process and evidenced its effectiveness and applicability in the AEDNs.

show abstract

Performance analysis of different series compensation schemes of SMIB power system incorporating PV generator

Cited by 3 publications

References 24 publications

Coordinated Control of Single-Phase End-Users for Phase Load Balancing in Active Electric Distribution Networks

Coordinated Control of Single-Phase End-Users for Phase Load Balancing in Active Electric Distribution Networks

A modified sine cosine algorithm with ensemble search agent updating schemes for small signal stability analysis

Coordinated Control of Single-Phase End-Users for Phase Load Balancing in Active Electric Distribution Networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About