2016 International Conference on Control, Electronics, Renewable Energy and Communications (ICCEREC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iccerec.2016.7814979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of dLife routing in a delay tolerant networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now we calculate the criticality I M (v i ) of each node after contraction according to formula (11). If the criticality I M (v i ) of node V i is bigger than the control parameter ε, it shows that the network structure is more compact after structure contraction.…”
Section: Community Structure Contraction Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now we calculate the criticality I M (v i ) of each node after contraction according to formula (11). If the criticality I M (v i ) of node V i is bigger than the control parameter ε, it shows that the network structure is more compact after structure contraction.…”
Section: Community Structure Contraction Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good routing performance can be achieved at a low cost. dLife, proposed by reference [11], is a routing protocol of DTN(Delay tolerant network), which uses two utility functions of time varying connection duration and node importance to implement forwarding decisions. Experiments show that buffer size and message size can affect the performance of dLife routing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zulkhan et al [32] evaluate the performance of dLife protocols in DTN concerning the impact of buffer and message size. dLife is a well-known protocol in DTN, which mainly comprises Time-Evolving Contact Duration (TECD) and TECD importance (TECDi).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These solutions are mainly based on a set of properties and behaviors relevant for MONs. Some of the most significant characteristics used in social routing are the community concept [29], reflected in works such as [30,31], the spacial centrality [32], with popular contributions such as EpSoc [33], SimBet [21], and Bubble Rap [16,34], interestbased communication [35] and contact graphs of nodes [36], and even abstract notions such as friendship or affinity [22,37,38]. Among these different approaches, those based on degree centrality have achieved great recognition in the literature.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%