2021 3rd International Cyber Resilience Conference (CRC) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/crc50527.2021.9392475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of Internet of Things Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL): Energy, Overhead and Packet Delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The OF0 is intended to be a baseline from which more refined objective function implementations can be developed. The second is the container-based minimal rank with hysteresis objective function (MRHOF) [54], [55], which is likely the most widely used routing metric. By using a metric container, users can modify the metrics that are transmitted alongside DIO messages.…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OF0 is intended to be a baseline from which more refined objective function implementations can be developed. The second is the container-based minimal rank with hysteresis objective function (MRHOF) [54], [55], which is likely the most widely used routing metric. By using a metric container, users can modify the metrics that are transmitted alongside DIO messages.…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar work has focused on the use of 6LoWPAN through performance metrics to describe congestion in an experimental network, using the Cooja tool simulator; for this purpose, a new algorithm is proposed to improve congestion, energy consumption, and performance over the deployment of nodes [54]. Also, another work focuses on improving routing in 6LoWPAN-based networks; for this purpose, several metrics are tested using the Cooja simulator tool; metrics such as packet delivery ratio, energy consumption, and control message overhead are tested through an experimental network [55]. But the work is not working with the same scenario of simulation for flood monitoring and our proposed algorithm.…”
Section: Lowpan and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to support lossy network with link outages and high packet error rate has distinguished RPL among the existing protocols (Tavakoli, 2009; Kim et al , 2005; Kim et al , 2007) for low power networks. Since then, RPL has been on target for many researchers (Chauvenet et al , 2010; Clausen and Herberg, 2010a, 2010b; Tripathi et al , 2014; Ching et al , 2021) who have focused on improving the design, optimizing and deploying of RPL in the network. RPL has gained maturity because of its flexibility to adapt several topologies, network conditions and quality of service support (Kamgueu et al , 2015; Karkazis et al , 2013; Velivasaki et al , 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%