2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2791580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of Joint-Sparse Recovery from Multiple Measurement Vectors via Convex Optimization: Which Prior Information is Better?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work focuses on the single measurement vector problem. Other works focused on Multiple Measurement Vectors (MMV) can be found in [26]- [29]. Some open research challenges related to sparse signal estimation are also discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work focuses on the single measurement vector problem. Other works focused on Multiple Measurement Vectors (MMV) can be found in [26]- [29]. Some open research challenges related to sparse signal estimation are also discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved by precisely revealing the locations of the phase transition of the high-dimensional group sparsity estimation problem via solving the convex optimization problem P. Although recent years have seen progresses on structured signal estimation [49], [50], [27], they only provide a success condition for signal recovery without precise phase transition analysis. The recent work [28] provided a principled framework to predict phase transitions (including the location and width of the transition region) for random cone programs [51] via the theory of conic integral geometry. Unfortunately, the approach based on conic integral geometry is only applicable in the real field case, which thus cannot be directly applied for problem P in the complex field.…”
Section: System Model and Problem Formulation A System Model Andmentioning
confidence: 99%