2018 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ecce.2018.8558087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of <tex>$H_{2}$</tex> Optimally Controlled Three-Phase Grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8: Experimental Rig Setup they are each tuned to the fastest bandwidth possible on the experimental setup. The PI controller for the AFE has been designed to 900Hz for the inner current loop, and 90Hz for the outer voltage loop, with use of the design procedure described in [35]. The LQR is tuned in order to be comparable in dynamic performance to that of the H 2 designed in Section IV-C, and using the same tuning procedures, Q γ for the LQR controller was selected as:…”
Section: Experimental Results and Performance Analysis A Experimementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8: Experimental Rig Setup they are each tuned to the fastest bandwidth possible on the experimental setup. The PI controller for the AFE has been designed to 900Hz for the inner current loop, and 90Hz for the outer voltage loop, with use of the design procedure described in [35]. The LQR is tuned in order to be comparable in dynamic performance to that of the H 2 designed in Section IV-C, and using the same tuning procedures, Q γ for the LQR controller was selected as:…”
Section: Experimental Results and Performance Analysis A Experimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…whilst R γ was selected to be that defined in (65). Due to the PI controller transfer functions not being dependant on frequency as shown in [35], a polynomial gain adaptation is not required for the PI. However, since the LQR control is similar in form to the H 2 controller, it is dependant on frequency, and therefore the LQR has also been adapted for variable frequency using the same procedure for the H 2 controller, as described in Section IV-D.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Performance Analysis A Experimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sections attribute to dashed lines are only valid in the identification procedure and will be detailed later. The PI gains are tuned by the pole-placement approach (17) [8]. f i , f v , and ξ are current, voltage bandwidth and damping factor respectively.…”
Section: A Traditional Pi Control Design Of Afementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is counter-intuitive however, as this results in the increased sizing and weight to the system. Work into H 2 optimization to synthesize decentralized global optimal controls have shown to be able to mitigate the problem of subsystem interactions under reduced passive filters [4]. This paper proposes a method for which H 2 optimization as shown in [2], [4] can be adapted such that optimal and stable performance can be guaranteed globally across the required frequency range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work into H 2 optimization to synthesize decentralized global optimal controls have shown to be able to mitigate the problem of subsystem interactions under reduced passive filters [4]. This paper proposes a method for which H 2 optimization as shown in [2], [4] can be adapted such that optimal and stable performance can be guaranteed globally across the required frequency range. Other methods of optimal, nonlinear controllers exist which to some degree could handle the proposed problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%