2020 4th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iceca49313.2020.9297525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of Machine Learning Approaches in Stroke Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
5

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
28
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, Random Forest Classifier can effectively reduce the risk of overfitting and achieve high accuracy by combining multiple decision trees. The BernoulliNB, KNeighbors, Logistic Regression, SVM, and GaussianNB models may not be as well-suited for stroke prediction as Decision Tree and Random Forest Classifier due to their sensitivity to imbalanced data, overfitting, and/or underfitting, as well as their inability to capture complex non-linear relationships among input features [9]. Additionally, these models may not be optimized for handling binary classification problems like stroke prediction, which requires accurate identification of the minority class (i.e., individuals who will have a stroke).…”
Section: Machine Learning Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Random Forest Classifier can effectively reduce the risk of overfitting and achieve high accuracy by combining multiple decision trees. The BernoulliNB, KNeighbors, Logistic Regression, SVM, and GaussianNB models may not be as well-suited for stroke prediction as Decision Tree and Random Forest Classifier due to their sensitivity to imbalanced data, overfitting, and/or underfitting, as well as their inability to capture complex non-linear relationships among input features [9]. Additionally, these models may not be optimized for handling binary classification problems like stroke prediction, which requires accurate identification of the minority class (i.e., individuals who will have a stroke).…”
Section: Machine Learning Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beberapa penelitian sebelumnya telah menggunakan teknik machine learning untuk memprediksi stroke (Sailasya & Kumari, 2021;Emon et al, 2020;Shafiul Azam et al, 2020). Algoritma machine learning seperti Support Vector Machine (SVM) digunakan untuk memprediksi stroke dan menghasilkan akurasi sebesar 90% (Jeena & Kumar, 2017).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Selanjutnya, Sailasya dkk melakukan analisis performa prediksi stroke menggunakan beberapa algoritma machine learning dan menghasilkan akurasi tertinggi pada algoritma Naïve Bayes sebesar 82% (Sailasya & Kumari, 2021). Penelitian (Emon et al, 2020) menunjukkan bahwa model dilatih menggunakan algoritma Decision Tree, Random Forest, Multi-layer perceptron untuk memprediksi stroke. Akurasi yang diperoleh untuk Decision Tree adalah 74,31%, Random Forest sebesar 74,53%, dan Multi-layer perceptron sebesar 75,02%.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) dataset was utilized by Singh and Choudhary [9] to predict stroke in individuals. Emon et al [10] implemented the learning-based classification algorithms namely XGboost, Random Forest, Navies Bayes, Logistic Regression and Decision Tree on the dataset which is retrieved from Kaggle. The likelihood of stroke was investigated by Kansadub et al [11] using decision trees, neural networks, and Naive Bayes analysis, and the study's authors attempted to predict strokes from the data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%