2016 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/wispnet.2016.7566510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of microstrip patch antenna employing Acrylic, Teflon and Polycarbonate as low dielectric constant substrate materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A co-axial cable feeds the antenna. For wearable antenna design, the authors [8] proposed three different substrate materials (Acrylic, Teflon, and Polycarbonate). It concludes the resonant frequency shift to high frequencies when substrate relative permittivity decreases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A co-axial cable feeds the antenna. For wearable antenna design, the authors [8] proposed three different substrate materials (Acrylic, Teflon, and Polycarbonate). It concludes the resonant frequency shift to high frequencies when substrate relative permittivity decreases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polycarbonate was used in several works such as [12]- [19]. Performance analysis was conducted by [13] at 2.535 GHz using polycarbonate substrate. The fabricated microstrip patch antenna achieves 4.4 dBi directivity and 3.8 dBi gain, resulting in 87% radiation efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper RPAs (Rectangular Patch Antenna) are designed with different materials with different dielectric constants in the lower range from 2≤ r<5 with 30 iterations of step size 0.1each. Higher r materials are not considered in this paper as it is known that thin substrate with higher dielectric constant are used for microwave circuitry because of its tightly bound fields; but, they are less efficient and have smaller bandwidth [4,5]. The working range of frequency is 1GHz to 6 GHz which cover our most of the day to day communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%