2014 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommuncations Systems (ANTS) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ants.2014.7057259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of multi-party conferencing in IMS using vacation queues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another track of works, a more explicit attention is paid to characterize the IMS framework by means of queueing theory models. Authors in [37] and [38] present valuable analyses of delay and bandwidth utilization, respectively. Both works focus on the features of single servers, without considering, as we do, the distinguished chain structure of IMS.…”
Section: Related Research and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another track of works, a more explicit attention is paid to characterize the IMS framework by means of queueing theory models. Authors in [37] and [38] present valuable analyses of delay and bandwidth utilization, respectively. Both works focus on the features of single servers, without considering, as we do, the distinguished chain structure of IMS.…”
Section: Related Research and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIP supports both centralized and decentralized frameworks of multi-party communication. Overview of the most recent researches done by Mishra in (Mishra, 2014) shows that distributed approach allows to enhance the conferencing server capacity but it has some limitations with full security and control over the complete network due to unavailability of central server; it increases signaling delay due to multiple functional entities participating in conference session setup. In centralized conferencing architecture (Tien, 2010), a single User Agent (UA) or focus has a direct relation with each participant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%