2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of Proximity and Light Sensors for Smart Parking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It gives high accuracy rate even in closed parking spaces. In [21], the performances of the sensors that control whether the parking spaces in the car parks are occupied or not were examined. These sensors exhibit different performances depending on the angle of the light and the distance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It gives high accuracy rate even in closed parking spaces. In [21], the performances of the sensors that control whether the parking spaces in the car parks are occupied or not were examined. These sensors exhibit different performances depending on the angle of the light and the distance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, GPP and PGS2 systems adopt ultrasonic waves, while Siemens systems use parking sensors placed on the ground [6]. Monitoring vehicles by infrared sensors is one of the most sensible methods while considering that the system is mainly aimed at large-and medium-sized parking lots, and ultrasonic sensors are very sensitive to temperature changes and extreme air [7]. Therefore the system adopts infrared photoelectric switches.…”
Section: Parking Garage Information Guidance Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collected from sensors were sent to a single server and centrally processed. In [21], a comprehensive analysis of the most relevant aspects of the design of a smart parking system has been presented. The article focuses mainly on the selection of adequate sensors and how to deploy them for accurately detecting state changes in the parking lot.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%