Performance analysis of real-time component architectures: An enhanced model interchange approach

Moreno, Gabriel A.; Smith, Connie U.

doi:10.1016/j.peva.2009.07.008

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreno, Smith and Williams have extended the S-PMIF to include features necessary for evaluating real-time, component-based systems [13]. They subsequently presented a substantially modified S-PMIF, version 2.0, that adapted the meta-model so that it can be expressed in terms of the Ecore meta-meta-modelthe core meta-model of the Eclipse Modeling Framework.…”

Section: Real-time and Component-based Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They subsequently presented a substantially modified S-PMIF, version 2.0, that adapted the meta-model so that it can be expressed in terms of the Ecore meta-meta-modelthe core meta-model of the Eclipse Modeling Framework. Several changes were made to better align S-PMIF 2.0 with other performance-related meta-models (PMIF, LQN, and ICM), to clarify terminology, and simplify the M2M transformations [27]. This work demonstrated the use of the model interoperability approach for component-based real-time systems, and implemented a M2M prototype to transform an intermediate constructive model (ICM) to S-PMIF.…”

Section: Real-time and Component-based Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Model Interoperability for Performance Engineering: Survey of Milestones and Evolution

Smith¹,

Lladó

2011

Performance Evaluation of Computer and Communication Systems. Milestones and Future Challenges

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Next generation Software Performance Engineering tools will exploit a model interoperability paradigm that uses the performance modeling tool best suited to the software/hardware architecture issues and the life cycle stage of the assessment. The paradigm allows the use of existing tools to the extent possible without requiring extensive changes to them. The performance model solution should be transparent to the user. Significant milestones have been accomplished in the evolution of this paradigm. This paper covers key results in the areas of Model Interchange Formats, model transformations, tools, specification of experiments and results, and extensions for real-time and component-based systems. It then offers conclusions on next steps and the future of the model interoperability paradigm.

show abstract

Section: Real-time and Component-based Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Real-time and Component-based Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Model Interoperability for Performance Engineering: Survey of Milestones and Evolution

Smith¹,

Lladó

2011

Performance Evaluation of Computer and Communication Systems. Milestones and Future Challenges

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Research community has demonstrated the viability of model-to-model transformations for design and analysis models interchange (Dobrica et. Al., 2011) (Moreno and Smith, 2009) (Martens et al, 2010). Interoperability is the ability of two or several tools to exchange information and thus to use the exchanged information.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of Transformations Providing Interoperability in Software Architecture Model-Driven Development

Dobrica

2011

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Software and Database Technologies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper defines the quality of model to model transformations based on a set of concerns addressed by an user and a developer. The user is a software architect that benefits of this quality during the design and evaluation of software architecture models. Then the paper performs an analysis of the quality on a recent approach of interoperability of tools and languages in a model-driven development environment. The key technique used to achieve interoperability stays in the alignment of various forms of metamodels. A special focus of discussion is on several aspects, such as the model transformation correctness, the management of the elements possibly lost while transforming or the back propagation of changes performed in the generated model to the original model.

show abstract

Enabling Performance Modeling for the Masses: Initial Experiences

Gómez

Smith

Spellmann

et al. 2018

System Analysis and Modeling. Languages, Methods, and Tools for Systems Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Performance analysis of real-time component architectures: An enhanced model interchange approach

Cited by 7 publications

References 12 publications

Model Interoperability for Performance Engineering: Survey of Milestones and Evolution

Model Interoperability for Performance Engineering: Survey of Milestones and Evolution

Quality of Transformations Providing Interoperability in Software Architecture Model-Driven Development

Enabling Performance Modeling for the Masses: Initial Experiences

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About