2005
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2004.840202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of space-time coding with imperfect channel estimation

Abstract: Abstract-We analyze the error performance of a space-time coding system using transmit and receive antennas with imperfect channel estimation in flat Rayleigh fading. A least-squares estimate of the channel matrix is obtained by using a sequence of pilot code vectors. The estimate is found to be perturbed by an perturbation matrix with zero-mean circular Gaussian entries. Using the characteristic function of the decision variable, we derive a closed-form expression for the pairwise error probability (PEP). Fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of the MMLD is clearly worse than that of the ML detector and the performance gap depends on σ 2 w [2]. As σ 2 w approaches 0, Z approaches H and the performance of the MMLD approaches that of the optimal ML detector in (2).…”
Section: Mimo Detection With Imperfect Csimentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of the MMLD is clearly worse than that of the ML detector and the performance gap depends on σ 2 w [2]. As σ 2 w approaches 0, Z approaches H and the performance of the MMLD approaches that of the optimal ML detector in (2).…”
Section: Mimo Detection With Imperfect Csimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As σ 2 w approaches 0, Z approaches H and the performance of the MMLD approaches that of the optimal ML detector in (2). When no estimate of the channel is available, equation (3) is no longer valid and the MMLD in (4) fails to provide any useful detection.…”
Section: Mimo Detection With Imperfect Csimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under high mobility situations, this problem is especially acute because the channel needs to be estimated more frequently which places significant pilot overhead and reduces system throughput. Compromising the quality of the channel estimate through the minimal usage of pilots results in severe performance degradation of the conventional Mismatched Maximum Likelihood (MML) MIMO receiver [1], [2]. A better receiver structure then is one which relies of joint channel-symbol estimation techniques [3], [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The M × N channel matrix is estimated prior to the data transmission from known pilot code vectors transmitted over a duration of L p symbol intervals. The CSI thus obtained is imperfect [4,5], and when in the decision variable processor at the receiver, the exact channel matrix is replaced by its imperfect estimate, it does not give an optimum decision criterion in the maximum likelihood (ML) sense. In this paper we consider three receiver structures given by [6]: (1) a suboptimum one in which in a perfect ML receiver the imperfect CSI is used in place of perfect CSI, (2) the optimum receiver I in which the imperfect CSI is used in the ML sense, (3) the optimum receiver II that jointly processes the received data code and the pilot code.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%