2016 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/wispnet.2016.7566368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of texture classification techniques using shearlet transform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the model with 4-level decomposition achieved the best accuracy in the previous experiment, we used this network in this experiment as well. We compared our model with a spectral approach using shearlet transform [24], a VGG network [5], T-CNN [2], and FV-CNN [8] with a fully connected layer (FC).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the model with 4-level decomposition achieved the best accuracy in the previous experiment, we used this network in this experiment as well. We compared our model with a spectral approach using shearlet transform [24], a VGG network [5], T-CNN [2], and FV-CNN [8] with a fully connected layer (FC).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training with fine-tuning: Figure 4 and Table 3 show the classification rates using the networks pre-trained with the ImageNet 2012 dataset [35]. We compared our model with a spectral approach using shearlet transform [25], VGG-M [4], T-CNN [1], and VGG-M using compact bilinear pooling [9]. For compact bilinear pooling, we compared our model only with Tensor Sketch (TS) since it worked the best in practice.…”
Section: Texture Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ere are some enhancements which are implemented such as GLDM and GLRLM [29,30]. e latest work is from GLCM that extracted different features of the face based on GLCM [31,32]. However, in the existing methods, there are some drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%