2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of two-stage thermoelectric generator model based on Latin hypercube sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Common experimental design methods include orthogonal array, central combination design, Latin hypercube design, and optimal Latin hypercube design. Among them, the Latin hypercube design has the ability to fit higher-order nonlinear relationships, and has more effective space-filling ability and higher efficiency than the full factorial design 10 ; while the optimal Latin hypercube design improves the inhomogeneity of the random Latin hypercube design, and can effectively avoid the possibility of losing some design space regions. 11 Therefore, in this paper, the optimal Latin hypercube method is selected for the experimental design, and the five design variables are selected, and the experimental results are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Sample Construction and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common experimental design methods include orthogonal array, central combination design, Latin hypercube design, and optimal Latin hypercube design. Among them, the Latin hypercube design has the ability to fit higher-order nonlinear relationships, and has more effective space-filling ability and higher efficiency than the full factorial design 10 ; while the optimal Latin hypercube design improves the inhomogeneity of the random Latin hypercube design, and can effectively avoid the possibility of losing some design space regions. 11 Therefore, in this paper, the optimal Latin hypercube method is selected for the experimental design, and the five design variables are selected, and the experimental results are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Sample Construction and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to utilize in SA with simple concepts and processes, but inefficient computation will appear if some sample points are sparsely distributed while others cluster closely. The LHS method is another methodology for producing a near-random sample of parameter values, between the RS and the stratified sampling technique, from multi-dimensional distribution [35]. LHS can generate more stable results than RS, but its drawbacks include space-filling and uncorrelated samples [36].…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike conventional MCS, LHS is a co-ordinated sampling strategy that relies on stratification of pre-specified input probability distribution. In the LHS technique, cumulative distribution curve is equally divided into n s sections and a sample is randomly drawn from each stratified section [27]. Hence, n s number of samples are generated using LHS.…”
Section: Generating Adequate Samples For Each Random Variablementioning
confidence: 99%