2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and accuracy of hybridized flux reconstruction schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, where we have computed t pFR /t pHFR and t pFR /t pEFR , and p FR , p HFR and p EFR are the polynomial degrees of a given FR, HFR and EFR scheme. Consistent with previous observations [7], hybridized methods show increased performance benefits at higher polynomial degrees. However, by looking at the diagonals of these tables, where we compare equal polynomial degrees for the hybridized and standard formulations, we see that at least 1.26 faster simulations were achieved at p = 1.…”
Section: A Cylinder At Re=150supporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…, where we have computed t pFR /t pHFR and t pFR /t pEFR , and p FR , p HFR and p EFR are the polynomial degrees of a given FR, HFR and EFR scheme. Consistent with previous observations [7], hybridized methods show increased performance benefits at higher polynomial degrees. However, by looking at the diagonals of these tables, where we compare equal polynomial degrees for the hybridized and standard formulations, we see that at least 1.26 faster simulations were achieved at p = 1.…”
Section: A Cylinder At Re=150supporting
confidence: 89%
“…with n k,f the physical outward unit normal vector and s a stabilization parameter [7], [11]. In contrast to standard FR formulations, where neighboring element information is used in the numerical flux, we have here introduced the so-called trace variable.…”
Section: The Hybridized Flux Reconstruction Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations