2017
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/3wsa2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and belief-based emotion regulation capacity and tendency: Mapping links with cognitive flexibility and perceived stress

Abstract: Cognitive reappraisal is among the most effective and well-studied emotion regulation strategies humans have at their disposal. Here, in 125 healthy adults, we examined whether one's capacity and one's tendency to reappraise differentially relate to perceived stress. We also investigated whether cognitive flexibility, a skill hypothesized to support reappraisal, accounts for associations between reappraisal capacity and tendency, and perceived stress. Although reappraisal tendency was inversely associated with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the computer tasks and self-report measures described here, we also collected data on an additional two computer tasks and several surveys. The computer tasks included a simplified, two-choice version of the SGT and a canonical probabilistic reversal learning task (identical to the one used in Guassi Moreira, Parkinson, & Silvers, 2017). Additional questionnaires tapped cognitive reappraisal capacity, cognitive reappraisal tendency, behavioral suppression tendency, domain-specific risk-taking, sensation-seeking, and perceived stress.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the computer tasks and self-report measures described here, we also collected data on an additional two computer tasks and several surveys. The computer tasks included a simplified, two-choice version of the SGT and a canonical probabilistic reversal learning task (identical to the one used in Guassi Moreira, Parkinson, & Silvers, 2017). Additional questionnaires tapped cognitive reappraisal capacity, cognitive reappraisal tendency, behavioral suppression tendency, domain-specific risk-taking, sensation-seeking, and perceived stress.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other factors of well-being include optimism (Seligman, 1991), hope (Delas et al, 2015), positive emotions, the ability to find meaning (Seligman, 2011;Noemic, 2018), positive relationships, self-acceptance (Ryff, 1995), self-esteem, autonomy, and a sense of control (Bandura, 1997). Emotional regulation (Guassi Moreira et al, 2022), assertiveness (Sarkova et al, 2013), and attachment styles (Mikulincer and Shaver, 2007) have also been considered variables influencing well-being, especially among youth. The effect of these three variables on emerging adults' well-being will be the focus of the present study, as they seemed to have attracted less attention from researchers than the others listed above.…”
Section: Determinants Of Emerging Adults' Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to regulate emotions helps cope with stress and predicts fulfillment and positive mental health (Gross and Muñoz, 1995). In emerging adults, feeling able to regulate their emotions is associated with well-being (Guassi Moreira et al, 2022). Enhancing emotional regulation abilities is considered likely to psychologically improve the individual (McMain et al, 2010), reduce stress, and support mindfulness (Prakash et al, 2015).…”
Section: Emotional Regulation In Emerging Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotion regulation (ER) is key to affective well-being (Gross et al, 2019;Troy et al, 2023). Because previous work has primarily focused on how emotional well-being is related to the habitual use of specific ER strategies (ERSs; e.g., Aldao et al, 2010;Hu et al, 2014), little is known about a person's general ability to effectively implement ERSs in their daily life (Guassi Moreira et al, 2022;McRae et al, 2012), as well as the differential effectiveness of ERSs across individuals, and the affective consequences of prioritizing the use of individually more effective ERSs (i.e., ER knowledge). To address these gaps in the literature, we meta-analytically re-analyzed 13 AA datasets.…”
Section: Meta-analytic Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%