2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.07.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and Durability of Cryopreserved Allograft Aortic Valve Replacements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In experienced centres, the use of allografts has been preferred as they have the advantage of adapting to irregular surfaces and provide haemostatic advantages with very good haemodynamic function and low thrombo-embolic risk, and can be used to repair concomitant lesions of the anterior mitral valve leaflet. 557,558 Additionally, allografts and stentless bioprostheses can be beneficial in small aortic roots and are associated with low reinfection rates. However, experience is generally limited to single-centre case series and there is no clear evidence of superiority of one valve substitute over the other.…”
Section: Surgical Approach and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In experienced centres, the use of allografts has been preferred as they have the advantage of adapting to irregular surfaces and provide haemostatic advantages with very good haemodynamic function and low thrombo-embolic risk, and can be used to repair concomitant lesions of the anterior mitral valve leaflet. 557,558 Additionally, allografts and stentless bioprostheses can be beneficial in small aortic roots and are associated with low reinfection rates. However, experience is generally limited to single-centre case series and there is no clear evidence of superiority of one valve substitute over the other.…”
Section: Surgical Approach and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While surgical replacement of the infected valvular tissue remains the primary treatment [19], the surgical community has been debating the best option for an aortic substitute, whether it should be a conventional xenograft or mechanical prosthesis, or allogenic or autologous tissues for decades. Several variables, such as the patient's age, risk factors, comorbidities, and contraindications to anticoagulation, as well as anatomopathological factors such as the extent of the infection and pathogen virulence, the timing of intervention, and specific features of the aortic substitute used such as durability and risk of infection recurrence, require prompt assessment during the decision-making process for surgical treatment of IE [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most often implemented as treatment for congenital heart disease, aortic root allograft surgery has been used for treatment of aortic valve endocarditis and and has also been shown to be effective in reducing postoperative infection risks [ 18 ]. While there has been debate on the durability of cryopreserved allografts, more recent studies have found that aortic allografts have comparable durability to prosthetic valves and can last for more than 15 years with careful selection of recipients and newer implantation techniques [ 19 , 20 ]. However, underlying thoracic aortic disease is often associated with structural complications, which limits the applicability of allografts in treating type A aortic dissection and thoracic aortitis [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there has been debate on the durability of cryopreserved allografts, more recent studies have found that aortic allografts have comparable durability to prosthetic valves and can last for more than 15 years with careful selection of recipients and newer implantation techniques [ 19 , 20 ]. However, underlying thoracic aortic disease is often associated with structural complications, which limits the applicability of allografts in treating type A aortic dissection and thoracic aortitis [ 20 ]. Moreover, the availability of properly sized allografts also limits its use in emergent surgical cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%