2018
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/377/1/012164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and Emission analysis of optimal DEE blended Pongamia pinnata L. biodiesel fuelled to EGR coupled Low Heat Rejection (LHR) Diesel Engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outcomes reveal that advancement of injection timing considerably enhanced all the explored variables except NOx for both the engines and in contrast to best outcomes are 6.5% improvement in BTE with the decrease of 4.5% brake specific energy consumption, 44% PM and 18.5% in NOx found for LHR unit fuelled by B85A15 at 330 BTDC with an 80% load contrast to RE with baseline. The best arrangement of RE found to be baseline at injection timing 310 BTDC through 80% load (Vamsi Krishna et al, 2018).…”
Section: Exhaustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes reveal that advancement of injection timing considerably enhanced all the explored variables except NOx for both the engines and in contrast to best outcomes are 6.5% improvement in BTE with the decrease of 4.5% brake specific energy consumption, 44% PM and 18.5% in NOx found for LHR unit fuelled by B85A15 at 330 BTDC with an 80% load contrast to RE with baseline. The best arrangement of RE found to be baseline at injection timing 310 BTDC through 80% load (Vamsi Krishna et al, 2018).…”
Section: Exhaustmentioning
confidence: 99%