SAE Technical Paper Series 2013
DOI: 10.4271/2013-01-2507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Biogas Fueled DI Diesel Engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study, volumetric efficiency was found to drop from 95% for the diesel-only mode to 91% with highest diesel substitution in dual fuel mode, with biogas containing as low as 40% methane. 15 The reduction in volumetric efficiency with biogas flow rate has also been reported by Barik and Sivalingam 16 and Barik and Murugan. 6…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In one study, volumetric efficiency was found to drop from 95% for the diesel-only mode to 91% with highest diesel substitution in dual fuel mode, with biogas containing as low as 40% methane. 15 The reduction in volumetric efficiency with biogas flow rate has also been reported by Barik and Sivalingam 16 and Barik and Murugan. 6…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…A study conducted on a biogas–diesel dual fuel engine with manually controlled biogas flow rate and governor-controlled pilot fuel injection rate showed that diesel substitution up to 30% on energy basis can be achieved at full load. 16 Biogas flow rates in the range of 0–0.6 kg/h were used. Luijten and Kerkhof 15 have shown that up to 55% diesel substitution on energy release basis is possible using biogas containing 70% methane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods such as carbon natural gas (CNG), hydrogen, and biogas, as primary fuels was inves-89 tigated by several researchers [2, 6,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. It was reported that, the 90 dual fuel operation gives a longer ignition delay and longer combus-91 tion duration [6][7][8]17,19,27], with a penalty in fuel consumption 92 [27,29] and drop in brake thermal efficiency (BTE) [7,[24][25][26]. Also, 93 the dual fuel operation gives higher CO and HC emission [20][21][22][23]30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barik and Sivalingam [82] found that exhaust gas temperature was lower by 2.8%, CO and HC higher by 16% and 21%, respectively, while NOx and soot lower by 35% and 41.3%, respectively, as compared to diesel operation for maximum diesel substitution at full load. At higher CO2 fractions, it remained undissociated, thereby acting as an inert gas and reducing the thermal efficiency.…”
Section: Emission Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barik and Sivalingam [82] worked on a biogas-diesel dual fuel engine where the pilot fuel flow rate was controlled by the governor and the biogas flow rate was varied manually from 0 -0.6 kg/h. At full load, the maximum diesel substitution (on energy basis) was 30%.…”
Section: Performance Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%