2018 Symposium on High Performance Computing Systems (WSCAD) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/wscad.2018.00034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and Energy Efficiency Evaluation for HPC Applications in Heterogeneous Architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that Jetson TX1 has worse time-cost performance compared to Jetson TK1 systems, this is because that Jetson TX1 has lower operating core clock frequency and lower instructions-per-cycle of Jetson TX1's GPU on some compute-intensive applications compared with Jetson TK1. This work [25] also studied the performance analysis with considering energy efficiency. In this study, two two matrices are used to measure energy consumption.…”
Section: F Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show that Jetson TX1 has worse time-cost performance compared to Jetson TK1 systems, this is because that Jetson TX1 has lower operating core clock frequency and lower instructions-per-cycle of Jetson TX1's GPU on some compute-intensive applications compared with Jetson TK1. This work [25] also studied the performance analysis with considering energy efficiency. In this study, two two matrices are used to measure energy consumption.…”
Section: F Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the performance metrics we use are mainly referred to the study [25] which uses two metrics to measure the energy consumption, they are the idle power, denoted as P idle , and the processing power, denoted as, P processing , respectively. The idle power indicates the consumed power when the edge device runs all the system functions in the background.…”
Section: B Data Collection and Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dong et al [14] analyze the energy efficiency of GPU BLAST which simulates compressible hydrodynamics using finite elements with CUDA and report a 2.5 times speedup and a 42% increase in energy efficiency. Klôh [15] report that there is a wide spread in terms of energy efficiency and performance when comparing 3D wave propagation and full waveform inversion on two different architectures. They compare an Intel Xeon coupled with an ARM-based Nvidia Jetson TX2 GPU module, and find that the Xeon platform performs best in terms of computational speed, whilst the Jetson platform is most energy efficient.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khare et al [24] proposed HCud-aBLAST for protein sequencing in 2017, which actually refines and encapsulates Hadoop and CUDA without high acceleration ratio. Kloh et al [25] compared the performance of X86 architecture, ARM architecture and Tesla architecture in three standard test sets and two real applications. By comparing and analyzing the medium-sized HPC system and mobile-based Jetson TX2 development board, it shows that a deep understanding of the application background, underlying framework and programming model is essential for performance and energy consumption.…”
Section: Free Beam or Cantilever Beam Modeling Is Often Used To Analyzementioning
confidence: 99%