1993
DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(93)90028-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and flow characteristics of nozzles for initially subcooled hot water (influence of turbulence and decompression rate)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So let's assume a linear expansion between inlet pressure of 5bar and an outlet at 1bar assuming that flashing inception begins at 3.5bar, a linear superheat reduction from 5K to 1K and a linear vapor volume fraction evolution from 0 to 1. These conditions are close to those of the test campaign conducted by [1]. This type of analysis omits 2D effects on the flow.…”
Section: Discussion On the Modelssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…So let's assume a linear expansion between inlet pressure of 5bar and an outlet at 1bar assuming that flashing inception begins at 3.5bar, a linear superheat reduction from 5K to 1K and a linear vapor volume fraction evolution from 0 to 1. These conditions are close to those of the test campaign conducted by [1]. This type of analysis omits 2D effects on the flow.…”
Section: Discussion On the Modelssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Note that the mass flow in Table 4 does not depend on the outlet pressure; that means that the nozzle operates in critical conditions. The uncertainties of the measured data reported in [1] are within 2% for mass flow rate, 2% for thrust, 1% for pressure and 0.5% for temperature. This leads to an uncertainty of 2.8% for velocity by uncertainty propagation (knowing that thrust is equal to 𝑚̇.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4, the fluid experiences a large pressure drop at the throat. This agrees well with similar results experienced in previous investigations [10] with similar experimental set-up and approximate nozzle geometry, but higher inlet and higher back pressures. …”
Section: Pressure Profilessupporting
confidence: 82%