2012 45th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture Workshops 2012
DOI: 10.1109/microw.2012.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and Power Solutions for Caches Using 8T SRAM Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper is an extension of our earlier paper [12]. The following are the differences between this paper and the earlier workshop publication.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This paper is an extension of our earlier paper [12]. The following are the differences between this paper and the earlier workshop publication.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The second improvement in the RMW can be achieved by detecting the silent writes [16] and avoiding the associated writeback operations [12]. The silent write refers to a write request that writes the value that is already stored, hence not making any difference [16].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The need for a compulsory read before write contributes additionally to power dissipation. We propose a new technique called Writeback grouping (WBG) that is a modified version of the writegrouping proposal presented in [17] to address these concerns. The address of the last-accessed (write) cache set and its associated tags are stored in a small buffer inside the cache controller called the Tag-buffer.…”
Section: Table II Xor Logic During Read For Inverting Input/output Bamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leakage power on-average is 4X lesser compared to a regular 6T-SRAM [18]. The total area required by the Tag-Buffer is approximately 150 bits considering a 48-bit virtual address [17]. The largest area-overhead is incurred due to the counter that maintains the number of read requests received.…”
Section: ) V Th Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%