Performance appraisal and culture: practice and attitudes in Hong Kong and Great Britain

Abstract

This article compares the practice of and attitudes towards performance appraisal for managerial and professional staff in Hong Kong and Britain, and considers the extent to which actual practice and employee preferences are in alignment. Findings suggest that appraisal may be more widespread in Hong Kong than in Britain. However, British appraisal tends to be more participative and to place greater emphasis on discussing objectives, development and career plans. Hong Kong appraisals appear to be more directive and Hong Kong respondents perceive a higher level of 'negative' appraiser behaviour. In spite of this, Hong Kong respondents show if anything slightly more con dence in the utility of appraisal than do British respondents. They show stronger support for appraisal's use for reward and punishment and less support for the objectives-setting and training and development uses than do the British sample. Hong Kong respondents are more likely than their British counterparts to favour involving a more senior manager in appraisal, and they are less likely to prefer more frequent appraisals. There was little evidence that Hong Kong respondents had a stronger preference for group-based appraisal criteria, although they did show more support than the British sample for the use of personality as a basis for appraisal. Overall, the suggestion is that appraisal has been adopted in Hong Kong organizations but that the practice of appraisal has been adapted to suit the cultural characteristics of the society.

Identification of management development needs: a comparison across companies of different ownership – foreign, joint venture and local in Sri Lanka

“…It is usual for the immediately superior manager to appraise the immediately subordinate managers; this is practised at the each level of the management. Snape et al (1998) also described the role of the immediate superior in performance appraisal. During the appraisal interviews MD needs are identified other than setting targets for the next review period.…”

Changing patterns of rewards in Asia: a literature review

“…First, Hofstede's (1980aHofstede's ( , 1980bHofstede's ( , 1983Hofstede's ( , 1991) theories on culture have been widely applied in cross-cultural comparative studies on reward practices between Asia and the West. These include comparative studies on distributive justice values (Giacobbe-Miller et al 1997), reward allocation preferences (Kim et al 1990, Chen 1995, Ramamoorthy et al 2005, managers' policy capturing (Zhou and Martocchio 2001), performance appraisal and culture (Snape et al 1998) and pay satisfaction (Fong and Shaffer 2003). Hofstede's (1980aHofstede's ( , 1980bHofstede's ( , 1983Hofstede's ( , 1991 comprehensive and significant empirical study of national culture identified differences between Eastern and Western cultures and provides strong support for the notion that management theories and practices are culturally bound.…”

Internationalization of multi-source feedback systems: a six-country exploratory analysis of 360-degree feedback

“…Although performance management practices are not well recognized in China (Lu and Shi, 2002), there exists some research on the topic. According to Snape et al (1998) Confucian cultural values coupled with collectivist and hierarchical orientations run counter to Western performance appraisal practices that focus on individual performance, accountability and open communication. Huo and Von Glinow (1995) argue that China's large power distance makes them less likely to conduct appraisal interviews and provide coaching to subordinates.…”