2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.06.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance assessment of innovative constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell for electricity production and dye removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
114
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 371 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
12
114
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to the pH profiles in a non-hybrid dual chamber MFC done in the previous study, similar trend can be observed when operated in the range of [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] C and 20-35 C where the pH of the fresh feed (pH 7.4) reached the minimum value of about 6.2 and 6.7, respectively after operated for 20-25 h before the pH started to move up slowly and finally became almost constant [39]. Nevertheless, it is very difficult to compare this performance with the current study because the previous study was done in a wide range of operating temperatures whereas in the current study, the pH profiles was obtained at each specific operating temperatures.…”
Section: Ph Profilessupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In comparison to the pH profiles in a non-hybrid dual chamber MFC done in the previous study, similar trend can be observed when operated in the range of [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] C and 20-35 C where the pH of the fresh feed (pH 7.4) reached the minimum value of about 6.2 and 6.7, respectively after operated for 20-25 h before the pH started to move up slowly and finally became almost constant [39]. Nevertheless, it is very difficult to compare this performance with the current study because the previous study was done in a wide range of operating temperatures whereas in the current study, the pH profiles was obtained at each specific operating temperatures.…”
Section: Ph Profilessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Nevertheless, standalone treatment system has limitation such as less wastewater treatment efficiency as compared to the MFC hybrid system [7]. Much studies had demonstrated the ability of hybrid MFCs in removing various types of pollutants present in the wastewater such as chemical oxygen demand (COD) [8][9][10], phosphorus [11], dye [12,13], suspended solids (SS) [10], total nitrogen (TN) [14], ammonia nitrogen (NH 3 À ÀN) [15,16], and so on. Majority of the effective pollutants removal were done by integrating MFC with other unit operation or processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 8.6 shows current available strategies for treatment wetlands operated as vertical flow MFC (adapted from Doherty et al, 2015) and Figure 8.6 (bottom), shows treatment wetlands operated under HF MFCs. Studies dealing with these aspects have only recently been published (Yadav et al, 2012;Fang et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2013;Zhao et al, 2013). The most common material for electrodes are graphite-based materials (either in the form of rods, granules or plates).…”
Section: Microbial Fuel Cell Treatment Wetlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, they claimed that designing a comprehensive system by integrating multiple technologies such as ecological treatment and fuel cells will make the whole process economic and eco-friendly [11]. Yadav et al, [12] investigated the first constructed wetland (CW)-MFC based on the rational that the stratified redox conditions in CWs can serve as cathode and anode compartments for developing a unique CW-MFC. They achieved proof of this principal using synthetic dye wastewater, operated under batch conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%