2021
DOI: 10.3390/en14061705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Assessment of Japanese Electricity and Gas Companies during 2002–2018: Three DEA Approaches

Abstract: This study has compared Japan’s major electricity and gas companies in terms of their corporate performance measures from 2002 to 2018 using three types of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approaches. We develop a new type of efficiency measures and indexes for DEA and then compare the performance of major electric power companies and city gas companies by examining a recent data set that include years after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. The data set incorporates the number of patents as a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid an occurrence of zero in dual variable (i.e., multipliers), this study specifies the following three types of data ranges (R) according to the upper and lower bounds of production factors: Under variable returns to scale, we determine the level of efficiency (θ(k) v ) of the k th DMU as follows:θ(k) v = 1 − Obj(k), where Obj(k) is the optimized objective value of the k th DMU of Equation (A2). See [69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76] for recent DEA developments.…”
Section: Appendix a Network Data Envelopment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid an occurrence of zero in dual variable (i.e., multipliers), this study specifies the following three types of data ranges (R) according to the upper and lower bounds of production factors: Under variable returns to scale, we determine the level of efficiency (θ(k) v ) of the k th DMU as follows:θ(k) v = 1 − Obj(k), where Obj(k) is the optimized objective value of the k th DMU of Equation (A2). See [69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76] for recent DEA developments.…”
Section: Appendix a Network Data Envelopment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%