2009 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2009
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2009.4983177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance assessment of the hybrid Archive-based Micro Genetic Algorithm (AMGA) on the CEC09 test problems

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, the performance assessment of the hybrid Archive-based Micro Genetic Algorithm (AMGA) on a set of bound-constrained synthetic test problems is reported. The hybrid AMGA proposed in this paper is a combination of a classical gradient based single-objective optimization algorithm and an evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithm. The gradient based optimizer is used for a fast local search and is a variant of the sequential quadratic programming method. The Matlab implementation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed algorithm executed 30 times for each test function and the average results obtained by MUDE are compared with the results of all the algorithms participating in the CEC 2009 competition (Zhang et al 2009b;Chen et al 2009;Huang et al 2009;Liu and Li 2009;Gao et al 2009;Kukkonen and Lampinen 2009;Qu and Suganthan 2009;Sindhya et al 2009;Tiwari et al 2009;Tseng and Chen 2009;Wang et al 2009;Zamuda et al 2009), as well as two other more recent multi-objective optimization algorithms (Venkata Rao and Patel 2013; Akbari and Ziarati 2012). The performance indicator used to quantify the quality of the obtained results is the IGD (Inverted Generational distance) Metric (Zhang et al 2009a).…”
Section: Benchmark Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed algorithm executed 30 times for each test function and the average results obtained by MUDE are compared with the results of all the algorithms participating in the CEC 2009 competition (Zhang et al 2009b;Chen et al 2009;Huang et al 2009;Liu and Li 2009;Gao et al 2009;Kukkonen and Lampinen 2009;Qu and Suganthan 2009;Sindhya et al 2009;Tiwari et al 2009;Tseng and Chen 2009;Wang et al 2009;Zamuda et al 2009), as well as two other more recent multi-objective optimization algorithms (Venkata Rao and Patel 2013; Akbari and Ziarati 2012). The performance indicator used to quantify the quality of the obtained results is the IGD (Inverted Generational distance) Metric (Zhang et al 2009a).…”
Section: Benchmark Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hybrid AMGA (Archive-based Micro Genetic Algorithm) [21] is a constrained multi-objective evolutionary optimization algorithm. For the purpose of selection, AMGA uses a two-tier fitness assignment mechanism; the primary fitness is the rank, which is based on the domination level, and the secondary fitness is based on the diversity of the solutions in the entire population.…”
Section: Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following algorithms were presented in this competition: MOEADGM (Chen, Chen, and Zhang 2009), OMOEAII (Gao et al 2009), OWMOSaDE (Huang et al 2009), GDE3 (Kukkonen and Lampinen 2009), LiuLi Algorithm , DMOEADD ), MOEA/D (Zhang, Liu, and Li 2009), MOEP (Qu and Suganthan 2009), NSGAII-LS (Sindhya et al 2009), AMGA (Tiwari et al 2009), multiple trajectory search (MTS) (Tseng and Chen 2009), ClusteringMOEA (Wang et al 2009) and DECMOSA-SQP (Zamuda et al 2009). In the competition on unconstrained multi-objective optimization, MOEA/D was the winner and MTS was ranked the second best.…”
Section: Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms Based On Coevolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%