2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-017-1244-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance assessment of turbular heat exchanger tubes containing rectangular-cut twisted tapes with alternate axes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[17] Exp. [ Non-uniform TA [30] Jagged TT [31] Twisted tape-Alternate [32] Peripherally-cut TT [33] Square-cut TT [34] Twin TT [35] Rectangular-cut Alternate [36] Double V-cut TT [2] Multiple TT [37] V-shaped winglet [38] V-shaped ring [39] TT and Wire coil insert [40] Fig. 16 Comparison between the thermal performance of the present study with recent studies in the field of vortex generators…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…[17] Exp. [ Non-uniform TA [30] Jagged TT [31] Twisted tape-Alternate [32] Peripherally-cut TT [33] Square-cut TT [34] Twin TT [35] Rectangular-cut Alternate [36] Double V-cut TT [2] Multiple TT [37] V-shaped winglet [38] V-shaped ring [39] TT and Wire coil insert [40] Fig. 16 Comparison between the thermal performance of the present study with recent studies in the field of vortex generators…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Present study, DCTT (b/c=0.9) Twin TT [32] Arc-TA [33] Cross hollow TT [12] Non-uniform TA [34] Jagged TT [23] TA [35] Peripherally cut 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As a result, the friction factor decreases, and the thermohydraulic performance intensified. Non-uniform TA [42] Jagged TT [43] Twisted tape-Alternate [44] Peripherally-cut TT [45] Square-cut TT [46] Twin TT [47] Rectangular-cut Alternate [48] Double V-cut TT [5] Multiple TT [49] V-shaped winglet [40] V-shaped ring [50] TT and Wire coil insert [51] Fig. 13 Comparisons of thermohydraulic efficiency parameter with previous studies…”
Section: Code Validationmentioning
confidence: 81%