Performance based analysis of open ground storey

Paidalwar, Akshay S; Awchat, Ganesh

doi:10.14445/23488352/ijce-v4i6p106

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The impact of earthquake loading on the construction of reinforced concrete are a major source of building damage. Additionally, the effects of this kind of building that lacks seismic reinforcement and was not seismically designed are vulnerable to failures [2,17]. This type of buildings is called soft floors buildings.…”

Section: Validation Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Seismic behavior of a strengthened full scale reinforced concrete building using the finite element modelling approach

Elwi¹,

Abdul-Hussein²,

Mohammed³

et al. 2022

PEN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Iraq, the increase in earthquake activity was observed, but most of the existing buildings can still suffer from severe injury or destruction, and therefore can cause major issues. In this paper, we performed numerically analyses by experimental modeling to demonstrate efficiency using final element analysis (FEA) in the development of modern solutions (FEA) in the development of modern solutions to maintain existing structures from the risk of earthquakes. Using ABAQUS software that supports dynamic analysis, and uses this model to use models for several ways to enhance the earthquake center. This model was a large-scale 4 building tested using a doctor dynamic test (PSD). Experimental models were performed by extending RC walls with various connectivity details in existing buildings to comply with gravity design only for this building. The goal of this study was to determine the impact of adding an above RC wall as a way of modernization, including the design of Dowels and their contribution to the new mouse wall's connection to the existing RC buildings. These enhancements are performed by converting the selected compartment to the new inlet wall RC [2]. The result of analysis modeling is 4.11% of the proportion of differences in the X direction in the upper layer displacement of Abaqus software and the experimental test of Elsa results, and 2.15% of the negative direction X is 4.11%. an accurate similarity and exact building modeling. After verification process, three earthquake enhancement methods are used Next analysis.

show abstract

Section: Validation Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%